NETC.com https://www.netc.com:443/bb/ |
|
Map readings vs. EPA Gamma readings https://www.netc.com:443/bb/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=1395 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | y2katy [ Sun Dec 20, 2015 5:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | Map readings vs. EPA Gamma readings |
Hi! So I had a question....Why am I reading on netc map CPM is around 26 for Sacramento CA. When I go on the EPA website and ask for information on Sac I see graphs showing me over 1000 Is there a disconnect, am I missing something.... Can anyone shed light? |
Author: | Bert490 [ Sun Dec 20, 2015 10:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Map readings vs. EPA Gamma readings |
The Netc maps show private Beta sites (starting with a 1:) and EPA Beta sites (4:), and for subscribers also the EPA Gamma sites (5: series, one of the 8 bands). The sensors used for measuring Beta and Gamma are different and higher readings for Gamma are expected. See https://www.netc.com/bb/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=278. |
Author: | KingCobra [ Mon Dec 21, 2015 3:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Map readings vs. EPA Gamma readings |
Bert490 wrote: The Netc maps show private Beta sites (starting with a 1:) and EPA Beta sites (4:), and for subscribers also the EPA Gamma sites (5: series, one of the 8 bands). The sensors used for measuring Beta and Gamma are different and higher readings for Gamma are expected. See https://www.netc.com/bb/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=278. Thanks for answering that question. ![]() |
Author: | y2katy [ Mon Dec 21, 2015 3:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Map readings vs. EPA Gamma readings |
yes thank you!!!! |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |